Decoupling your (event) system
About interface segregation, dependency inversion and package stability
You are creating a nice reusable package. Inside the package you want to use events to allow others to hook into your own code. You look at several event managers that are available. Since you are somewhat familiar with the Symfony EventDispatcher component already, you decide to add it to your package’s composer.json
:
{
"name": "my/package"
"require": {
"symfony/event-dispatcher": "~2.5"
}
}
Your dependency graph now looks like this:
Symfony2: Event subsystems
Recently I realized that some of the problems I encountered in the past could have been easily solved by what I’m about to explain in this post.
The problem: an event listener introduces a circular reference
The problem is: having a complicated graph of service definitions and their dependencies, which causes a ServiceCircularReferenceException
, saying ‘Circular reference detected for service “…”, path: “… -> … -> …”.’ Somewhere in the path of services that form the circle you then find the event_dispatcher
service. For example: event_dispatcher -> your_event_listener -> some_service -> event_dispatcher
.
Celebrating a year with "A Year With Symfony"
Almost a year ago, on September 4th, in front of a live audience, I published my first book “A Year With Symfony”. Since the first release, well over a 1000 people have read it. In February of this year, I added a new chapter to the book (about annotations).
A third edition?
Flipping through the pages and thinking about how I could best celebrate 1 year and 1000+ readers, I had the following ideas:
A better PHP testing experience Part II: Pick your test doubles wisely
In the introduction to this series I mentioned that testing object interactions can be really hard. Most unit testing tutorials cover this subject by introducing the PHPUnit mocking sub-framework. The word “mock” in the context of PHPUnit is given the meaning of the general concept of a “test double”. In reality, a mock is a very particular kind of test double. I can say after writing lots of unit tests for a couple of years now that my testing experience would have definitely been much better if I had known about the different kinds of test doubles that you can use in unit tests. Each type of test double has its own merits and it is vital to the quality of your test suite that you know when to use which one.
The PHP testing experience: Interview by Fernando Arconada
Fernando Arconada interviewed me about the subject of testing. He is writing a book about testing Symfony2 applications: Testing para Aplicaciones Symfony2. Fernando will translate this interview to Spanish and and add it to his book, together with the articles in my A better PHP testing experience series.
Who is Matthias Noback?
I’m a PHP developer, writer and speaker. I live in Zeist, The Netherlands, with my girlfriend, a son of 9 and our newborn daughter. Currently I have my own business, called Noback’s Office. This really gives me a lot of freedom: I work as a developer on one project for about half of the week and in the remaining time I can either spend some time with my family or write blog posts, or finish my second book.
A better PHP testing experience Part I: Moving away from assertion-centric unit testing
In the introduction article of this series I quickly mentioned that I think unit testing often focuses too much on assertions. The historic reason for this is that in introductory articles and workshops it is often said that:
- You are supposed to pick the most specific assertion the testing framework offers.
- You are supposed to have only one assertion in each test method.
- You are supposed to write the assertion first, since that is the goal you are working towards.
I used to preach these things myself too (yes, “development with tests” often comes with a lot of preaching). But now I don’t follow these rules anymore. I will shortly explain my reasons. But before I do, let’s take a step back and consider something that is known as the Test framework in a tweet, by Mathias Verraes. It looks like this:
A better PHP testing experience: Introduction
This is the introduction to a series of articles related to what I call: the “PHP testing experience”. I must say I’m not really happy with it. And so are many others I think. In the last couple of years I’ve met many developers who experienced a lot of trouble while trying to make testing a serious part of their development workflow. It is, I admit, a hard thing to accomplish. I see many people fail at it. Either the learning curve is too steep for them or they are lacking some insight into the concepts and reasoning behind testing. This has unfortunately led many of them to stop trying.
Symfony2: Framework independent controllers part 3: Loose ends
Thanks! Let me explain myself
First of all: thanks everybody for reading the previous parts of this series. Many people posted some interesting comments. I realized quickly that I had to explain myself a bit: why am I writing all of this? Why would you ever want to decouple controllers from the (Symfony2) framework? You probably don’t need to bother anyway, because
The chances of you needing to move controllers to other frameworks is next to none. — Rafael Dohms
Symfony2: Framework independent controllers part 2: Don't use annotations
In the previous part of this series we decreased coupling of a Symfony controller to the Symfony2 framework by removing its dependency on the standard Controller
class from the FrameworkBundle.
Now we take a look at annotations. They were initially introduced for rapid development (no need to create/modify some configuration file, just solve the issues inline!):
namespace Matthias\ClientBundle\Controller;
use Sensio\Bundle\FrameworkExtraBundle\Configuration\Route;
use Sensio\Bundle\FrameworkExtraBundle\Configuration\Method;
use Sensio\Bundle\FrameworkExtraBundle\Configuration\Template;
use Sensio\Bundle\FrameworkExtraBundle\Configuration\ParamConverter;
/**
* @Route("/client")
*/
class ClientController
{
/**
* @Route('/{id}')
* @Method("GET")
* @ParamConverter(name="client")
* @Template
*/
public function detailsAction(Client $client)
{
return array(
'client' => $client
);
}
}
When you use these annotations, the details
action will be executed when the URL matches /client/{id}
. A param converter will be used to fetch a Client
entity from the database based on the id
parameter which is extracted from the URL by the router. The return value of the action is an array. These are used as template variables for rendering the Resources/views/Client/Details.html.twig
template.
Symfony2: How to create framework independent controllers?
Part I: Don’t use the standard controller
The general belief is that controllers are the most tightly coupled classes in every application. Most of the time based on the request data, they fetch and/or store persistent data from/in some place, then turn the data into HTML, which serves as the response to the client who initially made the request.
So controllers are “all over the place”, they glue parts of the application together which normally lie very far from each other. This would make them highly coupled: they depend on many different things, like the Doctrine entity manager, the Twig templating engine, the base controller from the FrameworkBundle, etc.